Easter Island and its underlying volcanism

Rapa Nui / Isla de Pascua - Chile - flag / bandera

BY JASON KAMMERDIENER

Rapa Nui / Isla de Pascua - Chile - flag / bandera
Home
Location
Tectonic Setting
Eruptive History
Volcanic Deposits
Hazards Map
Monitoring
NVEWS
Assignments
Media 
Bibliography
Links
Easter Island fascinates with, its beauty, its culture, and its mystery.3
 

 

 

 

 

National Volcano Early Warning System*

 

Hazard and exposure factors used in threat assessment of U.S. volcanoes for the National Volcano Early Warning System.

See appendix text for discussion and explanation of abbreviations.

 

 

Hazard Factors

Score

 Explanation of Score

Volcano type

If volcano type is cinder cone, basaltic field, small shield, or fissure vents: Score = 0

If volcano type is stratocone, lava domes, complex volcano, maar or caldera: Score = 1

 0

Easter is primarily made of basaltic lava flows

Maximum Volcano Explosivity Index (VEI)

If maximum known VEI ≤ 2: Score = 0

If maximum known VEI = 3 or 4: Score = 1

If maximum known VEI = 5 or 6: Score = 2

If maximum known VEI ≥ 7: Score = 3

If no maximum VEI is listed by GVP and if volcano type = 0: Score = 0

If no maximum VEI is listed by GVP but volcano type = 1: Score = 1

If no known Holocene eruptions and the volcano is not a silicic caldera system: Score = 0

 0

Eruptions resulting in the lava flows evidenced at Easter would typically have a VEI of 0 or 1, possibly up to 2.

Explosive activity

If explosive activity (VEI ≥ 3) within the last 500 years: Score = 1

 0

No evidence of this type of activity

Major explosive activity

If major explosive activity (VEI ≥ 4) within last 5000 years: Score = 1

 0

No evidence of this type of activity

Eruption recurrence

If eruption interval is 1-99 years: Score = 4

If eruption interval is 100 – 1,000 years: Score = 3

If eruption interval is 1,000 to several thousand years: Score =2

If eruption interval is 5,000-10,000 years, or if no Holocene eruptions but it is a large-volume restless silicic system that has erupted in the last 100,000 years: Score = 1

If no known Holocene eruption: Score = 0

 2

Last eruption was ~2,000 years ago, but during activity it was likely more common.12, pg. 121  The average would therefore appear to be 1,000 to several thousand years.

Holocene pyroclastic flows?

If yes: Score = 1

 0

PFs do not occur at the types of volcanoes constituting the island.

Holocene lava flows?

If Holocene lava flows have traveled beyond the immediate eruption site or flanks and reached populated areas: Score =1

 1

"...fine-grained banded flows are common in the vicinity of Hanga-roa."12, pg. 121

Holocene lahars?

If Holocene lahars have traveled beyond the flanks and reached populated areas: Score =1

 0

No mention of lahars anywhere in literature; not typical of volcanoes seen on Easter

Holocene tsunami(s)?

Has it produced a tsunami within the Holocene? If yes: Score = 1

 0

No mention of tsunami(s) from Easter

Hydrothermal explosion potential?

If the volcano has had Holocene phreatic explosive activity, and/or the volcano has thermal features that are extensive enough to pose a potential for explosive activity: Score =1

 1

Abundance of water made me feel it was conceivable to cause phreatic eruption should water mix w/magma beneath surface.

Sector collapse potential?

If the volcano has produced a sector collapse in Quaternary-Holocene time and has re-built its edifice, or, has high relief, steep flanks and demonstrated or inferred alteration: Score = 1

 0

Volcanoes not steep enough.

Primary lahar source?

If volcano has a source of permanent water/ice on edifice, water volume > 106 m3: Score = 1

 0

No mention of lahars anywhere in literature; not typical of volcanoes seen on Easter

 

Historical Unrest Factors

Score

 Explanation of Score

Observed seismic unrest

Since the last eruption, in the absence of eruptive activity, within 20 km of the volcanic edifice? If yes: Score = 1

0

Observation of activity throughout semester indicates not.

Observed ground deformation

Since the last eruption, in the absence of eruptive activity, inflation or other evidence of magma injection? If yes: Score = 1

0

No data for this observation; presumably not

Observed fumarolic or magmatic degassing

Since the last eruption, in the absence of eruptive activity, either heat source or magmatic gases? If yes: Score = 1

0

No mention, meaning likely not.

Total of Hazard Factors

4

 

Exposure Factors

 

 

Log10 of Volcano Population Index (VPI) at 30 km

Calculated with LandScan population database. Visitor statistics for volcanoes in National Parks and other destination recreation areas are added to the VPI factor where available.

 3.579

Population ~3,8006, pg. 169

Log10 of approximate population downstream or downslope

Population outside the 30 km VPI circle included within the extent of Holocene flow deposits or reasonable inundation modeling. This factor to be used only with volcanoes that have a primary lahar hazard (e.g. Cascade stratovolcanoes) or significant lava flow hazard (e.g. Mauna Loa).

 3.217

In my hazard map I only drew part of Hanga Roa in lava flow zone; roughly estimated at 1/2 population of island: 1,650 (see reference above)

Historical fatalities?

If yes, and a permanent population is still present: Score = 1

 0

None

Historical evacuations?

If yes, and a permanent population is still present: Score = 1

 0

None

Local aviation exposure

If any type volcano is within 50 km of a jet-service airport, score = 1; if a Type 1 volcano is within 300 km of a jet-service airport, score = 1; if a Type 1 volcano is within 300 km of a major international airport, score = 2; if none of these criteria are met, score = 0.

 1

Easter Island has an airport.

Regional aviation exposure

This score is based on the log10 of approximate daily passenger traffic in each region. At present, in the U.S., this score ranges from 4 to 5.15. The regional risk code is applied only to type 1 volcanoes and those type 0 volcanoes that have produced explosive eruptions.

 0

Easter is a type 0 volcano that appears not to have had explosive eruptions.

Power infrastructure

Is there power infrastructure (e.g., power generation/transmission/distribution for electricity, oil, or gas) within flowage hazard zones, or in an area frequently downwind of the volcano and close enough to considered at some risk? If yes, score =1

 1

Island powered by diesel generators;21, pg. 33 assumption made that they may be in hazard zone.

Transportation infrastructure

Is there transportation infrastructure (e.g., port facilities, rail lines, major roads) within flowage hazard zones, or in an area frequently downwind of the volcano and close enough to considered at some risk? If yes, score = 1

 0

I made the judgment call that there are no transportation facilities vital to the island in danger zones based on aerial photos.

Major development or sensitive areas

Are there major developments or sensitive areas threatened (e.g., National Park facilities, flood control projects, government facilities, developed tourist/recreation facilities, manufacturing or other significant economic activity)? If yes, score =1

 1

The island contains Rapa Nui National Park; tourism to see the irreplaceable moai is the island's main economic activity.

Volcano is a significant part of a populated island

Holocene volcanic deposits cover >25% of land mass. If yes, score = 1

 1

Volcano IS the populated island!

Total of Exposure Factors

 10.796

 

Sum of all hazard factors x Sum of all exposure factors = Relative Threat Ranking
 4 x 10.796
 

 

Relative Threat Ranking = 40.796

 

Overall Threat Score = Moderate

          -Moderate includes volcanoes with relative threat rankings between 30 and 60

 

Required Monitoring Level = Level 3 (Basic Real-time)

            -Seismographic monitoring net

            -Deformation monitoring

            -Ability to monitor gas emissions

 

Current Monitoring Status = Level 1 (Minimal)

            -One seismic station on island

            -No evidence of other monitoring effotrs

 

Monitoring Gap = 2

 

This analysis implies that the volcanological situation of Easter Island is under monitored.  This situation likely represents the fact that Easter has never been active; without a history of activity or potential activity it is unlikely that any volcano will be monitored substantially.  Also, from my experience in doing the exercise I think NVEWS recommends a Level 3 monitoring status less because of Easter's potential for eruption, and more because the nature of a small volcanic island forces critical resources and populations near potential vents.

 

*This process is from an in class handout derived from PDF by John Ewert, USGS Open-File Report 2005-1164

Questions about this site? Contact Jason Kammerdiener at jkammerdiener@mail.colgate.edu